PDA

View Full Version : Money shot w/ White Dew facial cream


TonyLomak
06-30-2003, 11:40 AM
White Dew (http://www.tucsonweekly.com/tw/2003-06-05/curr.html)

Tucson porn-proprietor Tyrone Henry wants you to know that blowing your load on the faces of blindfolded, underage girls who think they're participating in a facial cream marketing study is not fraud or any other crime, no matter what the Arizona Court of Appeals said last month. He also wants you to know he was framed.

Whether he did it or not, he's serving a seven-year sentence because of the creative legal work of a Pima County prosecutor, Brad Roach

In the summer of 2000, Roach was assigned to prosecute Tyrone Henry after two teenage girls said he lured them to his home to try out a product called "White Dew" facial cream he was developing. Instead of exfoliation, they said they got ejaculation.

The girls, 15 and 16 years old at the time, said Henry showed them examples of women with "clumpy" white cream on their faces and then blindfolded them. The girls said they heard heavy breathing and Henry say, "It's coming," and then felt a thick, warm substance applied to their faces. They said he took photos, paid them $10 a piece and convinced them to make follow-up appointments. Thinking about it later, they realized they'd been hoodwinked and called the police.

Roach admits the hardest part of the case was figuring out what charge he could hang on Henry. It wasn't sexual assault because he didn't touch the girls sexually, and they didn't touch him. And it wasn't indecent exposure because the girls were blindfolded.

"It was fascinating," Roach said. "I don't want to say it was a once-in-a-lifetime case, but it's only once in awhile do you get something this bizarre."

In the end, the only charge Roach could get to stick was "fraudulent scheme and artifice." The Division II of the Arizona Court of Appeals concluded that Roach had made the right decision, knocking down Henry's appeal.

"It was a huge loophole," Roach said. "No one in the Legislature had ever thought of it. It's not the sort of crime that had come up before."

NCMojo
06-30-2003, 11:44 AM
Originally posted by TonyLomak "It was a huge loophole," Roach said. "No one in the Legislature had ever thought of it. It's not the sort of crime that had come up before.":lol:

Heat
06-30-2003, 11:45 AM
For some reason, I just don't see this crime as something that happens very often. Though I am sure that there will be a law against it pretty soon.

Breakfast with Girls
06-30-2003, 11:50 AM
Originally posted by TonyLomak
The girls said they heard heavy breathing and Henry say, "It's coming," and then felt a thick, warm substance applied to their faces.

LOL, and they didn't realize they had been tricked until sometime <i>afterward.</i>

theedge
06-30-2003, 12:23 PM
Next up.. in the Coke vs. Pepsi taste test tradition....


Vanilla milkshake blindfold taste tests! Now with pink straws!

Xanager
06-30-2003, 12:29 PM
rotfl

I would think it would be too embarrassing to go public with it. I'm sure their friends are roasting them.

DeputyDave
06-30-2003, 12:32 PM
Originally posted by Breakfast with Girls
LOL, and they didn't realize they had been tricked until sometime <i>afterward.</i> There’s gotta be some sort of crime in tricking the mentally challenged

Charlie Goose
06-30-2003, 12:32 PM
Note to self: Skip the Boston clam chowder blind taste test scheduled for Wednesday.

http://charliegoose.homestead.com/files/goose.jpg Honk!

Quatermass
06-30-2003, 12:59 PM
Pics?

fazeem
06-30-2003, 01:03 PM
I found it funny how the article had an actual link to the adult site 'Facials'

Can't say they were thourough.

kvrdave
06-30-2003, 01:04 PM
I wonder if they later agreed to test Two Ball Throat Cream?


I don't know who is worse in this story. How do you not know a guy is beating it if he is close enough to hit you?

L. Gowron
06-30-2003, 01:24 PM
Roach says there are people--in his own office--who find it hard to believe that these girls could possibly be so stupid.

Brain Stew
06-30-2003, 01:25 PM
You gotta hand it to the guy, he is really pushing the limits of the laws.

Technically if found guilty, he will be viewed as a bad businessman rather as a pervert in the eyes of the law :lol:.

Would anyone like to try some of my patented hot hair gel :eyebrow:? Ladies??

Brain Stew
06-30-2003, 01:28 PM
Originally posted by L. Gowron
Roach says there are people--in his own office--who find it hard to believe that these girls could possibly be so stupid.

I guess they haven't talked to a female high school student recently. Five minutes with some of the girls in my town, and I feel retarded.

Y2K Falcon
06-30-2003, 01:30 PM
Originally posted by kvrdave
How do you not know a guy is beating it if he is close enough to hit you?
Well, I'll just have to take your word for it, dave-o! ;)

kvrdave
06-30-2003, 02:05 PM
:lol: DRAT!!!

damn_skippy
06-30-2003, 02:33 PM
f-in tucson

icondude
06-30-2003, 02:53 PM
OK, somebody has to say it:

Why didn't I think of this first?

DodgingCars
06-30-2003, 03:07 PM
Maybe this is for the Cum Dumpers video I was reading about in Feedback.

kvrdave
06-30-2003, 03:10 PM
Dumpsters, n00b. Get your pr0n correct. Hilarious thread in feedback :lol:

DGibFen
06-30-2003, 03:37 PM
I'm still convinced that new episode of Ren and Stimpy is worse than this.

duz
06-30-2003, 08:35 PM
Bukkake!

Face/Off
06-30-2003, 10:41 PM
Several baseball bat swings to this guy's crotch should solve the problem.

immortal_zeus
07-01-2003, 01:51 AM
Brilliant.

http://www.ameritech.net/users/dvdtalk/rome.gif

Mad Dawg
07-01-2003, 07:31 AM
Originally posted by Breakfast with Girls
LOL, and they didn't realize they had been tricked until sometime <i>afterward.</i>

:lol: "Yeah, the facial cream is fine, but you should really think about making the bottle a little easier to open."

Giantrobo
07-01-2003, 08:04 AM
:lol:

Spooky
07-01-2003, 10:46 AM
Not familar with Arizona law, but I find it doubtful that a sexual assault charge wouldn't have held up in court...you don't have to make physical contact for someone to be assaulted (in most states I'm aware of). In fact, the mere INTENTION to assault would be a crime in most states (as attemtped murder is a crime).

Even if that didn't hold up, there WAS contact in this case (his spew on their faces). If this ISN'T physical contact, then throwing a knife or shooting someone wouldn't be physical contact either.

nycdude
07-01-2003, 01:05 PM
Originally posted by Charlie Goose
Note to self: Skip the Boston clam chowder blind taste test scheduled for Wednesday.

http://charliegoose.homestead.com/files/goose.jpg Honk!

LMAO

SleepyW
07-01-2003, 05:18 PM
I can only imagine the transcript of this case:

Girl #1: "So, Brandy, like when are we going to get those new shoes?"
Girl #2: "Like after this survey, okay?"
Henry (in background): "Uh, uh, uh..." [thwack thwack thwack]
Girl #1: "Yeah, totally--like, I'm waiting for this facial cream, hello!"
Girl #2: "Yeah, I hope this gets rid of my acne...Justin's asking me to the Prom Friday night."
Girl #1: "Bitchin'! Hey - dude, what are we waiting for?"
Henry: [groan] "Umm..." [grunt] "Could you ladies lean over a little bit please? I want to [grunt] make sure not to get any on your low cut halter tops [moan]."
Girl #2: "Oh, ok."
Henry: "Ok [thwack thwack thwack]...here it comes.......OOOHHHH yeah!"

Hmmmm....

mikehunt
07-01-2003, 08:46 PM
if the girls weren't under 18 at the time I'd have a lot of my normal pervert stuff to say

dtcarson
07-01-2003, 09:14 PM
Isn't assault just the threat? Since they didn't know what was going on, assault might be tough to prove [of course, IANAL.] I would say some sex law was probably broken; they don't have to understand what's going on for that to occur [viz molestation, etc.]