The very hot Christian

[art]

Girls and guys, what do you think of porn megastar Christian, also known as Christian XXX? He's done a lot of porn and he's well known for his chrome dome, perfect physique, and voracious sexual appetite for the gals. He's a true megastar. He has also been versatile and has performed across the board. He's one of the few sexually versatlile men to be accepted into straight porn, following on from people like Jack Wrangler and Jeff Stryker.

Sexually versatile women are automatically accepted into straight porn but sexually versatile men have to overcome barriers, prejudices, hatred and various threats.

[Nick Danger]

Well then. With the huge unmet demand from the porn-buying public, he should be a huge bestseller, a porno superstar.

[The_Infidel]

"Sexually versatile"? Why can't you just say "gay"?

[dvd-4-life]

Didn't most of the major male porn stars from the 70's and early 80's do gay porn also?

[Rockmjd23]

I liked him before he left for TNA.

[Houstondon]

Don't you mean "Max Diesel"? I guess if he were such a "megastar" as you put it (he finds about as much work as half the males in straight porn while working both sides of the fence), he wouldn't need multiple names. Seriously though, there are a number of people in the industry that refuse to work with him due to allegations of his working with untested trannies in England (among other places). He provides a decent scene most of the time (nothing extraordinary either way except for his tiny pop shots on the days he works too many scenes) and if he makes you that happy, good for both of you. ;)

[Mopower]

"Sexually versatile"? Why can't you just say "gay"?


"Gay"? "Gay!" The term is "The right way!". Get it straight! or I mean gay.

[art]

There are tons of straight guys who work with untested women. Are you going to apply the same standard to them? Oh, and let's not forget all the bisexual women who work with untested women and untested straight guys. Are you going to apply the same standard to them as well?

You see, when you start applying different standards to individuals, it's legitimate for someone to question it.

Overall, I think Christian is terrific and a breath of fresh air.

[fishdude]

This thread does not deliver :(

I thought Art was going to complain about the lack of religious folks in porn today.

[Mrs. Danger]

I know some hot Christians. Can we talk about them, instead?

[The_Infidel]

This thread does not deliver :(

I thought Art was going to complain about the lack of religious folks in porn today.
"I want more humble prayer in my dirty butt-sex videos."

[soggypie]

"Sexually versatile"? Why can't you just say "gay"?

hahaha
hes art waht did you expect?big words cover up the fact that his 'arguments' are pointless.

[KDforever]

Girls and guys, what do you think of porn megastar Christian, also known as Christian XXX? He's done a lot of porn and he's well known for his chrome dome, perfect physique, and voracious sexual appetite for the gals. He's a true megastar. He has also been versatile and has performed across the board. He's one of the few sexually versatlile men to be accepted into straight porn, following on from people like Jack Wrangler and Jeff Stryker.

Sexually versatile women are automatically accepted into straight porn but sexually versatile men have to overcome barriers, prejudices, hatred and various threats.

http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/3162/1162263969848vz1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[crazyronin]

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/135/398303330_ad501e49d2.jpg?v=0

[NCMojo]

Yeah, I think Christ is kinda hot:

http://www.mountaintimes.com/mtweekly/2006/0928/ted_neeley_1.gif

I'd do him. :shrug:

[FM]

Damn. I opened the thread before seeing who started it. I expected to see some hot bible-thumping chick. That one bit me in the ass. No, wait. Wrong thread to post anything about a guy's ass.

[art]

Sexually versatile does not mean "gay". Sexually versatile means sexually versatile.

[Mr. Salty]

Sexually versatile means sexually versatile.
I'm glad you don't work for Mirriam Webster. Dictionaries would suck.

[TomOpus]

I'm glad you don't work for Mirriam Webster. Dictionaries would suck.rotfl

[costanza]

Dictionary Facts!!!

[achau9598]

darn .. I came into this thread expecting something like this

http://www.staylace.com/gallery/gallery09/graphics/christian.jpg

[Frankenlola]

I'm glad you don't work for Mirriam Webster. Dictionaries would suck.

sexually versatile:

'sek-sh(&-)lE 'v&r-s&-t&l
Function: adjective

1: See "sexually versatile"
2: gay

[Brain Stew]

darn .. I came into this thread expecting something like this

http://www.staylace.com/gallery/gallery09/graphics/christian.jpg
I don't think art has expressed interest in any women in porn.

[TheMadMonk]

When you have 2 sexually versatile men in a scene together, you don't even need any women in it!

[Houstondon]

"There are tons of straight guys who work with untested women."

As a general rule of thumb, this is not true in modern porn. The larger companies won't use untested performers and even some of the biggest jerk directors turn people away without tests.

"Are you going to apply the same standard to them? Oh, and let's not forget all the bisexual women who work with untested women and untested straight guys. Are you going to apply the same standard to them as well?"

Since I'm not a performer, producer, director, or performer with my livelihood on the line, your question is another smoke screen. The fact of the matter is that unprotected anal sex greatly increases one's chances of catching AIDS. The last outbreak in porn (2004) was most likely the result of a male performer working with transexuals and then having unprotected anal sex with women. IIRC, the odds of a man catching it from a woman are also far less than a woman catching it from a man but you can consult with the CDC for any updates since I last checked. In fairness though, most of the people I've spoken with in porn refuse to have a scene with an untested partner regardless of gender.

"You see, when you start applying different standards to individuals, it's legitimate for someone to question it."

No one is applying different standards to anyone. Christian has sex with men, women, and gender-unidentifiable types, allegedly without tests. That is not standard behavior in the modern porn industry and given the lag factor between test results and actual infections, I can't say that I blame those unwilling to work with him.

"Overall, I think Christian is terrific and a breath of fresh air."

I'm glad he has a cheerleader out there considering the beating he's taken on XXXporntalk.com and elsewhere by those inside and out of the industry. He's an okay performer and strikes me as a nice guy most of the time but to call him a "megastar" (are there any of those in porn these days?!?) seems questionable. Until he can command a significant premium for all of his scenes, he's just another meat puppet. You might like his metro-sexual work in Chemistry 2 though since anally receptive men are still rare (Tom Byron, Lockwood, some no names, and Christian, for the most part)
http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=26700

Good luck trolling though... ;)

[eedoon]

Oh I get it. When art means sexually versatile, he means sexually versatile. He can be on top or in the bottom, that is. ;)

[art]

Houstondon,

If anyone's engaging in a smoke-screen, it's you.

The fact is that Christian and other male performers are tested repeatedly and succesively. Each month's test confirms the validity of the previous month's test. including the lag period that you cite. If a performer repeatedly tests clean over successive months' tests, then that is a self-verifying vote of confidence in the health status of that individual.

You might also want to refrain from the poppycock of "standard" behavior in straight porn performers. How the heck do you know who has sex with whom outside of the camera's glare? How do you know the bisexual female performer isn't having sex with a HIV positive woman in her private life? How do you know the straight male performer isn't having sex with a yeast-ridden girlfriend when he's not working on a set? The simple fact is you don't. The best insurance for anyone in the industry is to have a test, simple as that. Presumptions about behavior outside of the porn set are simply speculative nonsense.

And don't you dare try to inoculate the huge amount of bareback anal that occurs between men and women in straight porn movies. Are you suggesting that female poo contains special germicides as opposed to male poo?

Let me give you a word of advice. I'm an intelligent person and I have resources at my disposal. This includes a mind that can act like a Venus fly trap and an antenna that can detect bullcrap behind double-brick walls.

[The_Infidel]

Sexually versatile does not mean "gay". Sexually versatile means sexually versatile.
Although I cannot say I have seen any of his films, the man you are describing has apparently engaged in sexual intercourse with other men. That is gay.

[art]

The Infidel,

It is also gay when a woman has sex with a woman in a straight porn movie.

[The_Infidel]

Nobody is debating that fact. But I've also never tried to pass off lesbians as "sexually versatile".

[The Bus]

Art and his "posting games" -ohbfrank-

[art]

The Infidel,

I would also not refer to a lesbian as sexually versatile. But I would to a bisexual woman just as I would to a bisexual man.

[The_Infidel]

You may want to have someone come out and check your antenna. The self-detecting setting is on the fritz.

[Houstondon]

Art,
whatever imagined "abilities" you think you have, my comments on why many don't like to work with Christian are "their" comments, not mine. Just because he gets tested does not make it okay when he works in England with untested trannies since the tests in question may not pick up an AIDS infection for 6 months. That was the whole point, an agreed upon point, that testing for EVERYONE is the best way to LIMIT (not prevent) the spread of the diseases tested for. Since said tests are not currently broad based to include all the common STDs, I'm not in a position to project the frequency of those infections (to be fair, it seems like half the industry catches something after the show in January) but whatever behavior is engaged in off camera, the fact is that performers tend to have a lot of sexual contact with other performers and you can dance around the transmission rates all you like but certain groups ARE more at risk than others (per the medical community, not a self appointed guy like yourself with an agenda to sell) and irresponsible behavior is what led to the last few outbreaks.

"I'm an intelligent person and I have resources at my disposal. This includes a mind that can act like a Venus fly trap and an antenna that can detect bullcrap behind double-brick walls."

I'm sure you believe this to be true but you might want to at least consider what was written, not what you want to think was written. If a performer is knowingly engaging in high risk behaviors with untested partners (on or off camera) that have even higher risk factors (and are NOT tested regularly), I don't think you should be surprised when some people pass when it comes to working with the guy.

Ultimately, testing doesn't instantly pick up infections and as there is no cure for AIDS (ask Laura Roxx, Trica Devereaux, Darren James, or others infected about it), playing it safe is better than playing it for a political statement as you would have them do. (and whatever "resources" you have regarding the private behavior of performers, it amounts to the same thing except most of them don't brag about it online) Further, I'm not going to start a detailed explanation on "WHY" transmission rates vary when all that information is readily available on the CDC website for you to enjoy at your leisure.

[art]

Houstondon,

Won't pick up an AIDS infection for 6 months? LOL. Now I think you might be inventing things. There is no such thing as "won't pick up an AIDS infection for 6 months". Even if it were true, which it isn't, how would that differ for a straight male performer who has had sex with a HIV-infected bisexual female? No difference at all. Maybe you should go and disseminate your selective gibberish on the half-breed site known as XPT.

[art]

Houstondon,

Moreover, you haven't explained why a penis entering a female intestine is somehow inoculated from disease transmission as compared to a penis entering a male intestine. If you want facts, here's a couple:

1. If both parties are healthy, they can have as much unprotected anal sex as they please. They will not transmit any venereal diseases. The sexual orientation of the parties is absolutely irrelevant in this context.

2. Being a gay or bisexual man doesn't mean that you automatically have a disease. Moreover, if being a gay or bisexual man was the cause of AIDS, then you would have to attribute AIDS to divine intervention as no disease-causing microbe has the capacity to think by itself and select people on the basis of sexual orientation.

Get real, Houstondon.

[soggypie]

i thought art was banned?
if he wasnt he should be.these posts of his are just f-ckin pointless
'waa-waa-waa theres too little gay porn'

hey art

1.your gay-admit it
2.theres a little something called internet porn.maybe youve heard of it.
3.within the category of this internet porn,there is GAY porn.

why do you have to bitch because your gay porn heroes arent recognized as good performers?or whatever vendetta you have about the supposed 'persecution of gay porn'?

just find gay porn on the internet,wank off and save us the trouble of reading your bullsh*t

[Frankenlola]

I'm an intelligent person and I have resources at my disposal. This includes a behind that can act like a penis guy trap and an "antenna" that can detect bullcrap behind double balls.

Here are some facts for you:

1: The moon is made of cheese.
2: Any gibberish typed on a forum with-out a legitimate source is bull-shit. So much so even your antenna can detect it.

Troll on!

[NCMojo]

Houstondon,

Won't pick up an AIDS infection for 6 months? LOL. Now I think you might be inventing things. There is no such thing as "won't pick up an AIDS infection for 6 months". Even if it were true, which it isn't, how would that differ for a straight male performer who has had sex with a HIV-infected bisexual female? No difference at all. Maybe you should go and disseminate your selective gibberish on the half-breed site known as XPT.
From the CDC (http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/testing/resources/qa/be_tested.htm#wait):
How long after a possible exposure should I wait to get tested for HIV?

Most HIV tests are antibody tests that measure the antibodies your body makes against HIV. It can take some time for the immune system to produce enough antibodies for the antibody test to detect and this time period can vary from person to person. This time period is commonly referred to as the “window period”. Most people will develop detectable antibodies within 2 to 8 weeks (the average is 25 days). Even so, there is a chance that some individuals will take longer to develop detectable antibodies. Therefore, if the initial negative HIV test was conducted within the first 3 months after possible exposure, repeat testing should be considered >3 months after the exposure occurred to account for the possibility of a false-negative result. Ninety seven percent will develop antibodies in the first 3 months following the time of their infection. In very rare cases, it can take up to 6 months to develop antibodies to HIV.
Hats off to you, Houstondon. Excellent call on testing.

[art]

NC Mojo,

The lag period is the same for straights and bi women - it doesn't discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. Get used to it.

Moreover, keep in mind how the CDC response is framed. It's after a "possible exposure". If you're clean and the person with whom you're having sex is clean, there is no "possible exposure". Again, the same applies to straights and bi women. .


Houstondon,

Keep in mind that most of the people in the world with AIDS are hetero's. Yes, hetero's. This immediately proves that gay sex does not cause AIDS.

I think your perceptions are colored by your selectively homophobic prejudices. I hope the entire industry gets taken over by bi men as you inadequate straights vegetate in your pajamas in front of the computer wondering why the heck you aren't getting any action. Maybe it's because bi men are hotter.