Review Feedback: Gangbang Auditions #18

[jerome]

This is a response to <a href="/reviews/read.php?ID=19858">Gangbang Auditions #18</a>

I was reading the XCritic review of 'Gangbang Auditions #18', and... Have to say that Rog at Rog reviews was probably spot on. He thought that the only way anyone would like this flick was if they were either into dudes or hated women. I flipped through the flick and saw enough to think he may have had a point. After reading your reviewer (Col Mustard) say that 'if you're into watching women get abused this is for you' I don't wonder if he's a misogynist, I wonder if he's also into dudes.

Good luck on doing a better job in the future.

[Houstondon]

This is a response to <a href="/reviews/read.php?ID=19858">Gangbang Auditions #18</a>

I was reading the XCritic review of 'Gangbang Auditions #18', and... Have to say that Rog at Rog reviews was probably spot on. He thought that the only way anyone would like this flick was if they were either into dudes or hated women. I flipped through the flick and saw enough to think he may have had a point. After reading your reviewer (Col Mustard) say that 'if you're into watching women get abused this is for you' I don't wonder if he's a misogynist, I wonder if he's also into dudes.

Good luck on doing a better job in the future.

Well, Mustard's comments are in line with Roger's from what you say so does that mean you're calling Rog gay or a misogynist too? Think about it, and the larger issue in general; Mustard is pointing out that people into abuse porn will like it very much. The movie is not advertised as a touchy-feely, couples flick but instead as a movie about gangbangs where women are pushed to their limits. I'd ask this of any of you (Rog, Mustard, or Jerome); did the movie provide the kind of action it advertised on the cover or in ads?