Porn Reviews Porn News XCritic Pick Search Adult DVD Reviews Porn Star Blogs Interviews
XCritic Forum | Porn News and Adult Movie Reviews

Go Back   XCritic Forum | Porn News and Adult Movie Reviews > Porn Talk > Adult Film Talk & Reviews

Adult Film Talk & Reviews The place to talk about adult films and XCritic's Reviews

New Reviews

Review Feedback: Stephanie Swift's Crystal Playmate

Adult Film Talk & Reviews


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2008, 08:29 PM   #1
Beautiful Dreamer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 7
Default Review Feedback: Stephanie Swift's Crystal Playmate

This is a response to Stephanie Swift's Crystal Playmate

I've read quite a few of your reviews claiming how "fluffy" women like larger toys. May I ask, in your experience, what genetic feature these women contain that equates body size to vaginal size? As a full figured woman, I find it quite offensive.
__________________
-Beautiful Dreamer
http://beautifuldreamer30.blogspot.com

Last edited by Beautiful Dreamer; 12-03-2008 at 09:22 PM.
Beautiful Dreamer is offline  
Sponsored Links

Old 12-04-2008, 07:57 AM   #2
Houstondon
XCritic Reviewer
 
Houstondon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beautiful Dreamer View Post
This is a response to Stephanie Swift's Crystal Playmate

I've read quite a few of your reviews claiming how "fluffy" women like larger toys. May I ask, in your experience, what genetic feature these women contain that equates body size to vaginal size? As a full figured woman, I find it quite offensive.
Hmmm, considering I am one of the most frequent supporters of full figured women (in my 5000+ reviews, my personal life, and as an advocate when routinely discussing the use of women that look like women with production companies), I think your wrath is misplaced. Your biography tells us you are in your 20's so maybe it's fair to point out that I'm about twice as old as you and not exactly a social recluse for most of those years.

Currently, my active testing pals are fluffy/BBW/full figured, all three of them, and I have a few gal pals that are slightly leaner but not by much (ie: they do not fit the "18 year old, 90 lb" ideal of the porn industry) that also like toys. In my experience, larger women have repeatedly and consistently expressed a preference for larger toys while smaller women wanted smaller toys when it came to penetrative sex. I know that a tiny gal popping out a kid can have a bigger snatch than a huge gal with a case of cobweb coochie but I refuse to ignore what I am told by those I've slept with, tested toys with, or simply been friends with in the name of being PC.

In the review in question, I pointed out that I get complaint letters from people that are upset over the size of my testers since they (the complainers) believe larger women are into bigger toys. (see the quote below) I disagreed with the sentiment but have admitted more experience=more likely to want bigger toys, my objection being that larger women are not NECESSARILY into larger toys, but it has been a factor in my experience. If you prefer smaller toys, that's great because we have been getting many in for review and just as porn is a majority of one (we all have different tastes), so is what kinds of toys we enjoy playing with.

"One type of email I get is from a handful of (presumably) ladies that complain how my personal toy testers are all "fluffy" (built for comfort over speed) since that means they are necessarily into larger toys. While I disagree with the sentiment on some levels, I am the first to admit that the more experience someone has with toys in general, the more they tend to want to experience larger, stronger, and more advanced toys."
Houstondon is offline  
Old 12-04-2008, 09:31 PM   #3
Beautiful Dreamer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 7
Default

Thank you for the swift & thorough response.

I must have misunderstood you in this review as well as in the Citron Edition one. "it was one of the thicker toys I've tested; built for fluffy sized gals who enjoy thickness more." My apologies.

Please continue to support full figured women & I look forward to more of your reviews. Have a great day.
__________________
-Beautiful Dreamer
http://beautifuldreamer30.blogspot.com
Beautiful Dreamer is offline  
Old 01-20-2009, 05:50 AM   #4
free_remo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
Default

Great one thnx
free_remo is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2012 XCritic.com